Toni Morrison will endure

The whites didn’t bear speaking on. Everybody knew.

I’m a seventy-two-year-old straight white male, born into an upper middle-class Jewish household. I dropped out of college in 1966 and spent at least the next three decades recklessly squandering some of the advantages my array of privileges created for me and discovering the multitude of ways that those same privileges nevertheless would manifest to rescue me. Would I have escaped quite as many fraught situations relatively unscathed if I had been gay or female or of color? Probably not, but it’s a certainty that I have not earned all the do-overs that life has granted me.

Regardless, over the years it has become increasingly clear to me that however impossible it might be to evade my white-skin privilege, I need to find productive ways to reckon with it, to understand it, and to use it, wherever and whenever possible, for good. Ultimately, that means to me that I should learn how to be an anti-racist, to stand forthrightly against the white supremacist culture of our country.

A variety of life experiences, including my friendships and work relationships with black folks (see most especially my tribute to Phyllis Hall, her son Perry, and the rest of her family in "The Spirit of Phyllis Hall"), the energizing effects of the moral and political courage of leaders like Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X, and numerous lessons learned from writers like Richard Wright (Black Boy, Native Son)Manning Marable (How Capitalism Underdeveloped Black America), Bryan Stephenson (Just Mercy), bell hooks, Edward Baptist (The Half Has Never Been Told), Isabel Wilkerson (The Warmth of Other Suns), James Baldwin, Alice Walker, Tupac Shakur, Langston Hughes, June Jordan, Amari Baraka, Roxane Gay, poet Brian Gilmore, Colson Whitehead, Toni Morrison and many others, have been instrumental in leading me to the conclusion that standing aside from the struggle against white supremacy would be the ultimate in privileged behavior; and, also, because our collective lives, impoverished by a society that absolutely refuses to recognize the humanity of people of color as equal in every way to that of “white” people, white supremacy injures us all. It deprives us of the full range of achievement and invention that would enhance every aspect of our lives together, and sentences us to shared fear, anxiety and misery. In such a world—in this world—anti-racism and active opposition to white supremacy is a fundamental first step in getting to a truly just society. I will go even further than that to say that I don’t believe that our country can right itself, can address other truly urgent problems, like climate change and disastrously underfunded public education, without also dismantling white supremacy.

I don’t know when I first discovered Toni Morrison, but it was probably around 1971 or 1972 when I came across a paperback copy of The Bluest Eye, Morrison’s first novel. I have since read three or four other books by Morrison, both The Bluest Eyeand Belovedmore than once. Most recently, just before Morrison died, I’d begun rereading Belovedfor the third time, in the process coming full on the understanding, maybe for the first time, that straight, white males were not the audience that Morrison had in mind when she sat down to write. In fact, this time around I felt like a spectator —a voyeur, perhaps— watching while Morrison told a wise and important story for the benefit of all her beautiful babies, her African American readers, who would have both an instinctive grasp of the story she told, and would move on from the story with a richer understanding of the weaknesses and strengths, of the trials and burdens and transcendent beauty of black folks, in the land of white supremacy and African American dauntlessness.

I cannot say how the United States gets from where we are now, with a president whose banalities, crudities and cruelties are so deeply rooted in racism and privilege, to a place where our biggest gifts—our multiculturalism, our collective creativity, inventiveness and profound sense of community, and our fundamental human desire to do good—define a United States where equal justice prevails, but I am certain that it would help for us to read more Toni Morrison.

I submit the following quotations from Belovedfor the benefit of those who need to be enticed to pick up one of Morrison’s books and read through to the end. I further submit that Morrison’s work is certain to lead most readers to the inevitable conclusion that four centuries of travail have equipped black folks to lead the way to that place where equal justice prevails; a lesson that white folks need to learn over and over again if we are to reach the promised land.

Passages from Toni Morrison’s Beloved:

Paul D “…recognized the careful enunciation of letters by those, like himself, who could not read but had memorized the letters of their name. He was about to ask her who her people were but thought better of it. A young colored woman who was drifting was drifting from ruin. He had been in Rochester four years ago and seen five women arriving with fourteen female children. All their men—brothers, uncles, fathers, husbands, sons—had been picked off one by one by one. They had a single piece of paper directing them to a preacher on DeVore Street. The war had been over four or five years then, but nobody white or black seemed to know it. Odd clusters and strays of Negroes wandered the backroads and cow paths from Schenectady to Jackson. Dazed but insistent, they searched each other out for word of a cousin, an aunt, a friend who once said, ‘Call on me. Anytime you get near Chicago, just call on me.’ Some of them were running from family that could not support them, some to family; some were running from dead crops, dead kin, life threats, and took-over land. Boys younger than Buglar and Howard; configurations and blends of families of women and children, while elsewhere, solitary, hunted and hunting for, were men, men, men. Forbidden public transportation, chased by debt and filthy ‘talking sheets,’ they followed secondary routes, scanned the horizon for signs and counted heavily on each other. Silent, except for social courtesies, when they met one another they neither described nor asked about the sorrow that drove them from one place to another. The whites didn’t bear speaking on. Everybody knew.”

 Pg. 52-53

“This girl Beloved, homeless and without people, beat all, though he couldn’t say exactly why, considering the colored people he had run into during the last twenty years. During, before and after the War he had seen Negroes so stunned, or hungry, or tired, or bereft it was a wonder they recalled or said anything. Who, like him, had hidden in caves and fought owls for food; stole from pigs; who, like him, slept in trees in the day and walked by night; who, like him, had buried themselves in slop and jumped in wells to avoid regulators, raiders, patrollers, veterans, hill men, posses and merrymakers. Once he met a Negro about fourteen years old who lived by himself in the woods and said he couldn’t remember living anywhere else. He saw a witless colored woman jailed and hanged for stealing ducks she believed were her own babies.

            “Move. Walk. Run. Hide. Steal and move on. Only once had it been possible for him to stay in one spot—with a woman, or a family—for longer than a few months. That once was almost two years with a weaver lady in Delaware, the meanest place for Negroes he had ever seen outside Pulaski County, Kentucky, and of course the prison camp in Georgia.

            “From all those Negroes, Beloved was different. Her shining, her new shoes. It bothered him. Maybe it was just the fact that he didn’t bother her. Or it could be timing. She had appeared and been taken in on the very day Sethe and he had patched up their quarrel, gone out in public and had a right good time—like a family. Denver had come around, so to speak; Sethe was laughing; he had a promise of steady work, 124 was cleared from spirits. It had begun to look like a life. And damn! a water-drinking woman fell sick, got took in, healed, and hadn’t moved a peg since.

            “He wanted her out, but Sethe had let her in and he couldn’t put her out of a house that wasn’t his. It was one thing to beat up a ghost, quite another to throw a helpless colored girl out in territory infected by the Klan. Desperately thirsty for black blood, without which it could not live, the dragon swam the Ohio at will.”

Pg. 66

“I did it. I got us all out. Without Halle too. Up till then it was the only thing I ever did on my own. Decided. And it came off right, like it was supposed to. We was here. Each and every one of my babies and me too. I birthed them and I got em out and it wasn’t no accident. I did that. I had help, of course, lots of that, but still it was me doing it; me saying, Go on, and Now. Me having to look out. Me using my own head. But it was more than that. It was a kind of selfishness I never knew nothing about before. It felt good. Good and right. I was big, Paul D, and deep and wide and when I stretched out my arms all my children could get in between. I was that wide. Look like I loved em more after I got here. Or maybe I couldn’t love em proper in Kentucky because they wasn’t mine to love. But when I got here, when I jumped down off that wagon—there wasn’t nobody in the world I couldn’t love if I wanted to. You know what I mean?”

“Paul D did not answer because she didn’t expect or want him to, but he did know what she meant. Listening to the doves in Alfred, Georgia, and having neither the right nor the permission to enjoy it because in that place, mist, doves, sunlight, copper, dirt, moon—everything belonged to the men who had the guns. Little men, some of them, big men too, each one of whom he could snap like a twig if wanted to. Men who knew their manhood lay in their guns and were not even embarrassed by the knowledge that without gunshot fox would laugh at them. And these “men” who made even vixen laugh could, if you let them, stop you from hearing doves or loving moonlight. So you protected yourself and loved small. Picked the tiniest stars out of the sky to own; layed down with head twisted in order to see the loved one over the rim of the trench before you slept. Stole shy glances between the trees at chain-up. Grass blades, salamanders, spiders, woodpeckers, beetles, a kingdom of ants. Anything bigger wouldn’t do. A woman, a child, a brother—a big love like that would split you wide open in Alfred, Georgia. He knew exactly what she meant; to get to a place where you could love anything you chose—not need permission for desire—well now, that was freedom.”

Pg. 163

“When the women assembled outside 124, Sethe was breaking a lump of ice into chunks. She dropped the ice pick into her apron pocket to scoop the pieces into a basin of water. When the music entered the window she was wringing a cool cloth to put on Beloved’s forehead. Beloved, sweating profusely, was sprawled on the bed in the keeping room, a salt rock in her hand. Both women heard it at the same time and both lifted their heads. As the voices grew louder, Beloved sat up, licking the salt and went into the bigger room. Sethe and she exchanged glances and started toward the window. They saw Denver sitting on the steps and beyond her, where the yard met the road, they saw the rapt faces of thirty neighborhood women. Some had their eyes closed; others looked at the hot, cloudless sky. Sethe opened the door and reached for Beloved’s hand. Together they stood in the doorway. For Sethe it was as though the Clearing had come to her with all its heat and simmering leaves, where the voices of women searched for the right combination, the key, the code, the sound that broke the back of words. Building voice upon voice until they found it, and when they did it was a wave of sound wide enough to sound deep water and knock the pods off chestnut trees. It broke over Sethe and she trembled like the baptized in its wash.

“The singing women recognized Sethe at once and surprised themselves by their absence of fear when they saw what stood next to her. The devil-child was clever, they thought. And beautiful. It had taken the shape of a pregnant woman, naked and smiling in the heat of the afternoon sun. Thunderblack and glistening, she stood on long straight legs, her belly big and tight. Vines of hair twisted all over her head. Jesus. Her smile was dazzling.

“Sethe feels her eyes burn and it may have been to keep them clear that she looks up. The sky is blue and clear. Not one touch of death in the definite green of the leaves. It is when she lowers her eyes to look again at the loving faces before her that she sees him. Guiding the mare, slowing down, his black hat wide-brimmed enough to hide his face but not his purpose. He is coming into her yard and he is coming for her best thing. She hears wings. Little hummingbirds stick needle beaks right through her headcloth into her hair and beat their wings. And if she thinks anything, it is no. No, no. Nonono. She flies. The ice pick is not in her hand, it is her hand.

“Standing alone on the porch, Beloved is smiling. But now her hand is empty. Sethe is running from her, running, and she feels the emptiness in the hand Sethe has been holding. Now she is running into the faces of the people out there, joining them and leaving Beloved behind. Alone. Again. Then Denver, running too. Away from here to the pile of people out there. They make a hill. A hill of black people, falling. And above them all, rising from his place with a whip in his hand, the man without skin, looking. He is looking at her.

Pg. 261-262

Job one for white progressives: Engage other white folks about racism

A recent study exploring the effect of race-based political messages on white subjects showed that a certain subset of whites, "liberals with higher levels of racial resentment," were particularly responsive to both racially explicit and implicit attacks on government social programs. The story, headlined "Why Some White Liberals Will Probably Vote For Donald Trump," ran on the Huffington Post website earlier this month,

Reporter Arthur Delaney noted that the study's authors, sociologists Rachel Wetts and Robb Willer,
"offered a few theories about why [racially coded] welfare rhetoric would move white liberals more than conservatives. One is simply that conservatives are so familiar with welfare-bashing from Republican officeholders that they can't be swayed any further," he wrote.

"Another is that liberals may be uniquely vulnerable to this rhetoric because they are afraid to talk about racial inequality. Watts and Willer noted that 'strong norms of colorblindness in liberal political culture mean negative outcomes among black Americans as a group are rarely discussed.'"

Clearly, it would be rash to reach any number of conclusions based on a  single academic study, which itself cannot be fairly assessed without knowledge of the kind of details that a news report cannot easily include or evaluate. Still, another statement in the article provides a jumping off point for considering where white progressives should focus their activism. "...strong norms of colorblindness in liberal political culture mean [that] negative outcomes among black Americans as a group are rarely discussed," Delaney wrote, quoting Watts and Willer.

That suggests to me that white folks who consider themselves allies of African Americans have a particular responsibility to engage other whites who may have "higher levels of racial resentment" in discussions of the history, the social and cultural impact, and the continuing significance of 400 years of racism in the United States.

This is necessary for a number of reasons. In 2016, Donald Trump won 46 electoral votes in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin that had twice previously been won by Barack Obama. Trump won those three states by less than 90,000 total votes, giving him 306 electoral votes to Hillary Clinton's 232. There are all sorts of ways to parse that outcome, including the notion that far lower 2016 turnouts of African American voters in Philadelphia, Detroit, Flint and Milwaukee compared to the two previous Obama campaigns may by themselves account for Hillary Clinton's defeat.

But the combination of white Obama voters who defected to Trump, or who voted Green or Libertarian, or who simply sat out the election because their distaste for Clinton obscured their grasp of the damage a Trump victory would, could, and did do, very likely were also enough to swing the three critical states away from Clinton. Looking ahead to the presidential election in 2020, it seems reasonable to conclude that increasing African American turnout and effectively mobilizing estranged white liberals are key to denying Trump a second-term.

In a country that is increasingly polarized and seems almost ungovernable, addressing the general white refusal to understand the full impact of slavery, of the collapse of reconstruction, of Jim Crow, night riders, lynch mobs, mass incarceration, disinvestment and 400 years of economic exploitation is a central task, now and into the future. Whatever one believes to be the most urgent policy questions facing our country, our government and ourselves, it is clear that our collective political dysfunction stands in the way of effective government action on any number of priorities, including climate change, economic inequality, public education, the right to organize, mass incarceration, abortion rights and so much else.

I would argue that racism and white privilege are the very root of that dysfunction. If that is so, and, if for that particularly critical subset of white liberals who can be moved by racist dogwhistles avoiding discussion of race issues is both bad habit and unfortunate priority, than white progressives who are willing to promote discussions of race with other white folks can play a critical role in the effort to restore functionality to our political life.

African Americans cannot play that role with whites. Nor should they. As a practical matter, African Americans already deal with white racism 24/7. They are isolated by it, defined by it, under attack by it, undermined by it and stereotyped by it. Nevertheless, productivity, inspiration and genius are part of the heritage and the contemporary experience of African Americans individually and in community. Eliminating white obstacles to the dissemination of African American social and cultural influence, and the enhanced quality of life that would follow, ought to provide further motivation for white progressives.

We know, or can guess, how much better life could be in the United States if the obstacles to full creative participation in our culture were eliminated for all. Racism alone has probably wasted more work, more talent, more genius than any other single factor. Had we found a way to continue the work of reconstruction after the Civil War, to restore stolen wealth, to create a world characterized by equal justice and equal opportunity, our current political challenges would almost certainly feel far less urgent. That is the world we could come to live in, but getting there may depend very much on the efforts of white progressives to lead in opening the discussion of racism and white supremacy within our own communities.

This will be hard and will take persistence, human kindness, and an unrelenting focus on the world still to win. But we must keep our eyes on that prize.

Borderlands

“I’m sorry, Mommy,” the little dude says, his voice sounding someplace between pathetic pleading and true sorrow.

Just a moment ago, he was neither pleading or sorry. He was strutting in his shades, tank top, tasteful shorts and sandals. Parading back and forth on the sidewalk in front of the Sugar Shack on 26^thStreet. He was holding a waffle cone (sucked and licked dry and empty), arm up high, looking like some tiny 21^stCentury version of the Statue of Liberty, which is nowhere near Chicago, so please forget that I even brought it up.

The Sugar Shack is mobbed on summer nights despite the fact that it has no indoor seating, four small tables and eight chairs on the sidewalk, and uncommonly slow service. An ice cream aficionado at the end of the line might wait a good half hour to place an order and wait most of the rest of the hour to get the sweet treat for which she came. The front décor, menu signs, and miscellaneous designs are repetitive and about pink as they can be. There are two signs, posted on doorways on either side of the order and fulfillment windows that request patrons to respect the neighbors, park legally, hold down the noise level, and clean up their trash. These appeals are signed at the bottom in script. “Sugar Shack,” they say. These are the only places on the building where the business is actually identified by name.

The little dude is still wailing. He has also bruised a knee or two and it’s possible that pain has contributed to his anguish. Mom is not having any of it. “I told you to stop your running around,” she says, picking up the fallen but clearly undamaged cone with which he had been lighting his way, and tossing it. He moans. It is one more small trauma the little dude must process on his way to becoming a bigger dude.

A guy holding two small ice cream cones and accompanied by a child who no doubt will end up eating one of them, makes his way back to a minivan, where a woman stands with another child. “Looks good,” I say to him, or to the kid, or to the ether, as he walks by, and the guy smiles, making the barest minimum of eye contact.

A few minutes later, I’m at the pick-up window having assumed that a long enough portion of life has passed by to justify the expectation that my strawberry shake is ready. I’m wrong, of course and I can hear the voice of my irritatingly clever youngest son say, “Assumptions make an ass of you and me, Dad.”

But I’m standing there when minivan guy come back and edges up next to me. “I bet there’s a hundred dollars in that book bag,” he says.

I take a moment to process that statement. Is he talking to me, I wonder. What’d he say, I think. I look at him. He’s smiling, but it’s not the kind of smile that lights anything up. “No, I doubt it,” I respond. “There’s nothing in it, but stuff I’ve written. I think it’s worth way more than a hundred bucks, but I’ve never run into anybody else who thinks so.”

“Just joking,” he says.

“Ah. You got to give an old guy a little bit of extra time to get the joke. I’m not as quick on the uptake as I once was.”

He looks confused, but he keeps smiling that smile that doesn’t light up his eyes or anything else. Then he turns and walks away.

Shortly after, I get my milkshake. It feels like a reward. The chunks of strawberry in the shake clog my straw and slow down my rate of consumption. That’s a good thing.

I take a seat at a curbside table. The people in line seem content to wait and ready to chat with both friends and strangers. A woman carrying a cardboard tote with four sundaes of varying description balanced precariously walks back to a car parked right next to my table. She passes the good stuff inside to three passengers, all women, who are clearly thrilled to welcome her back. She walks around to the driver’s door and hops in. Someone passes her sundae back and they sit there, eating and talking.

A minute passes and here comes the guy with the fake smile. He makes eye contact with me and looks away. He has either never seen me before, a case of mistaken identity, maybe, or he simply sees no reason for further interaction. Whatever use value I once had, it’s gone.

He walks up to the driver and says something I can’t hear, but he points at the minivan and then points further down the street. The woman in the car is clearly reluctant to respond to him, but he keeps smiling and explaining and she shrugs and nods. The passenger in the back seat slides over and he gets in. They drive off, four women and a guy I’ve already decided is a psychopath. He probably does need the help, I’m guessing. Maybe a gallon of gas?

At any rate, the driver appears to have concluded that she can do whatever favor he’s asking for and that she and her friends are taking no real risk. But I can’t help thinking that the dude will keep playing people until playing them stops getting results. What happens after that is anybody’s guess.

I finish my strawberry shake and, satisfied, move on.

Neverending Story

You know the story,

the one that ends with the hero

face down in the mud.

Or, maybe, the story that ends

at the by-no-means guaranteed discovery

of the protagonist dead on the bed,

her eyes shut tight against

light and dark,

out of range of the magic that forever

lurks and lingers in the rare and intangible air.

They are, I tell you,

the self-same story but for the details,

which I do not mean to demean.

After all, if the stories are the same

wherever they end,

and at all of their ends,

then the details

—the way the life came

and the way the life went—

twisting and turning,

falling down and getting up,

are all that really matters.

And,

we so stipulate,

the details, the twisting and the turning,

the magic before

and the magic that lingers,

the falling up and the getting down,

are the major symptoms,

the proof we can infer,

of the grinding wheel,

the great grinding wheel,

the irresistible force

constantly confronting

the human (objects) on their way,

and always in the way

of the grinding, travelling wheel

that somehow contrives

to always be rolling down

our very path, our whatever path,

to wherever we meant to be,

to where we would be,

in whole or in part,

but for the wheel that rolls

always against us,

always failing to know

that we are exactly there

where we are.

All of which means

that at the very least,

it makes no sense to blame the wheel

that has no ethics, no passion, no fun and no life.

Entirely unlike our uncelebrated selves,

with our vast potential

for ethics and passion and fun

and life before death.

So tell the stories, all,

of Jack, say, and Jill

and the great fun they had

on the twisting way uphill,

and the tumble down,

and the get back up to go back up,

where there remained more fun to be had,

or still a world to spy from the top,

until one broke a body part

or broke the spirit that gets back up 

and left the other to solo the rest of the way.

All we know is that they set out one day,

one ordinary, even familiar, day,

to work at their endless tote

and on the way they ran afoul

of warlords, maybe, or amphibians

—the rare bloodthirsty kind—

or calendars stuffed full of deadlines.

They labored, dripped sweat, danced and dodged

and laughed aloud and fled in terror.

It wasn’t much,

but it was life

and it would do.

Sometimes they shared their load

and sometimes traded it for a different load,

or passed it on and sat to rest.

One day very like the day before

and the day to come.

It isn’t much,

but it is life

and it will do.

Colson Whitehead's "The Underground Railroad"

Lessons in white supremacy

            Some books never stop teaching what needs to be taught. Noam Chomsky’s American Power and the New Mandarinsis one of those books. So is Elaine Pagel’s The Gnostic Gospels. Hannah Arendt’s The Origins of Totalitarianism is another. And Naomi Klein's Shock Doctrine is one more. I’ve read dozens of books that struck me that way and I’ve just finished another—Colson Whitehead’s The Underground Railroad. I don’t expect everyone who reads Whitehead’s wonderful novel about slavery and an actual, tangible underground railroad (complete with real engines, engineers, train stations and on-time problems) to come to the same conclusion about the book that I did, but, maybe.

Whitehead is relentlessly effective at portraying the myriad ways individual slaves and freemen struggled with slavery and white supremacism. They endure it, of course, evade it, escape it, always compromise with the pervasive reality of it, and frequently succumb to it. Only rarely do the white people they encounter show them a human face. Rarer still are the white folks who offer assistance of any sort and many of those falter at crucial moments, undone by their own privilege, weakness, fear, guilt and past histories of sordid compromise.

            Cora and Caesar and Royal and every other African American in the book must navigate a world dominated by monumental cruelty, by the abuse of slave masters and slave catchers and a collection of white folks who benefit from African American misery and who also conspire in varying degrees in the work of maintaining and prolonging that misery. As it happens, even black folks born free and living in the north must reckon with white supremacy. They lived with a continuing message of jeopardy based on skin color, and had to exercise regular caution against being snatched by rogue slave catchers operating in the north. Free, but not enfranchised, they were aware that if they were captured, judges and others with the power to intervene on their behalf were likely to stand aside, if not conspire, in their misfortune.

None of this should come as a surprise to anyone even remotely familiar with the history of slavery and every other guise white supremacy has assumed in the 150 years since the Civil War—the southern counterattack on Reconstruction, Jim Crow and the criminalization of blackness, lynching and white terror attacks on black communities, segregation and discrimination, and mass incarceration and the New Jim Crow. But the lessons are there in The Underground Railroad and the seeds of the relentless and continuing oppression of African Americans are foreshadowed in the story the book tells.

The traumas associated with slavery and blackness serve to highlight the indomitable qualities of the slaves, runaways and freemen who nevertheless survived, who sought and built community, who rebuilt when those communities were decimated and who managed to find joyful relief in transient experience. The whole range of reactions that traumatized human beings display are fundamental elements in the world Whitehead has created; one in which misery, brutality and murder were the norm, and intelligence, grit, strength and endurance were frequently not enough to survive. The strong fall right next to the weak. People are brought down by the weight of experience. Often, they go mad. Sometimes, tortured beyond human endurance, they cooperate with the masters and collaborate in the awful violence.

That, too, is a story we already know and understand. But the most human thing about all of us is that nothing we claim to already understand should assure us that we know all we need to know about racism in America, especially if we are white and have the privilege of forgetting what we know, of ignoring how we have benefited from the exploitation of others, of the ways whiteness exempts us from facing up to ugly truths about ourselves and our world. What we need to know, what we may have already learned once or twice, we need to learn again, over and over, until knowing becomes like breathing, and those of us with privilege in our DNA are moved to absolute solidarity with the people who do not share that heritage.

Forty acres and a mule will only begin to repair the damage that white supremacy has perpetrated. It may be that the feeling that one has done right in moving beyond privilege is not enough, but it strikes me that a world in which equal justice is the foundation of life will be richer and more rewarding for every last one of us. Colson Whitehead’s book is a good place to begin our reeducation. We should get started. The reading list is long. So is the to-do list that comes with it.